top of page

PEER REVIEWING FOR CASH: Are Paid Error Spotters the Future of Scientific Accountability?

In the ever-evolving landscape of scientific publishing, two key pillars are reshaping the way research is conducted and disseminated: open access and transparency in peer review.

Open Access Publishing is Here to Stay

The concept of open access has gained significant traction as a model that champions the unrestricted availability of scholarly articles. Major publishers, such as Elsevier, Springer, and Wiley, have increasingly embraced open access journals, sometimes even sacrificing profit, to break down paywalls and ensure that research is freely accessible to the global community.

For publication specialists in STEM research, this shift accelerates the pace of discovery and promotes collaboration, creating a more inclusive and cooperative environment.

Research Integrity Through Transparent Peer Review

In tandem with open access, transparency in peer review has become a focal point for enhancing the credibility of published work. Major publishers have explored open peer review models, going beyond traditional methods by disclosing reviewer identities and comments. JMIR Publications and Pre-review implement a type of open and public peer review model where authors, reviewers and experts are on a conference call to discuss the research (before it goes through traditional peer review). This trend, towards a greater level of "openness" in peer review, provides readers with a clearer understanding of the evaluation process, encouraging constructive criticism and holding researchers accountable for the quality and reliability of their work. For us professional publication specialists, this transparency ensures a more informed and accountable peer-review process.

Throwing Cash at the Feet of Failure

Amidst these transformative shifts, a pioneering model has emerged – "Estimating the Reliability and Robustness of Research." Funded by the University of Bern, this initiative mirrors the compensation practices of software companies that reward programmers for identifying flaws in code. However, this novel approach is tailored for the realm of scientific publishing, specifically targeting psychology papers and preprints.

The model offers reviewers compensation of up to 3500 Swiss francs (approximately $4000) based on the severity of errors uncovered. What sets it apart is the inclusion of authors in the process. Authors must provide advance consent, and if their work proves reliable, they, too, receive compensation. "Scientific-misconduct accusations are leading to retractions of high-profile papers, forcing reckonings within fields and ending professorships, even presidencies. But there’s no telling how widespread errors are in research" (Chronicle of Higher Education)

"Scientific-misconduct accusations are leading to retractions of high-profile papers, forcing reckonings within fields and ending professorships, even presidencies. But there’s no telling how widespread errors are in research..."

Now, This dual-incentive structure addresses the prevailing issue of a lack of motivation for both authors and reviewers to actively identify and rectify errors in the scientific literature. For publication specialists, this approach offers a tangible and collaborative way to ensure the reliability and robustness of STEM research.

Just One of Many New Peer Review Models

As we witness the convergence of open access and transparent peer review, major publishers play a crucial role in shaping the future of scientific discovery. By embracing models like "Estimating the Reliability and Robustness of Research," both publishers and researchers actively contribute to a culture of collaboration, accessibility, and quality assurance in scientific research.

This synergy between open access and transparent peer review will undoubtedly shape the future, creating a more accountable and dynamic environment for publication specialists and researchers in open access peer-reviewed STEM research. provides a unique blend of expertise in science, technology, business, and legal communications with a proven track record in building positive online reputations and driving impactful results. Leverage our almost decade long expertise in scholarly peer-reviewed publishing to drive innovation, collaborate with academic institutions, and stay at the forefront of technological advancements in your industry.


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page